torture is wrong

opposing torture through activism and education

 

Subscribe to the Blog Feed

feed-image Articles
from the dept of lies, damn lies and your liberal media narratives PDF Print E-mail
Monday, 16 November 2009 09:59

Portrait of 9/11 ‘Jackal’ Emerges as He Awaits Trial
 
In a front page article of several thousand words about KSM and his upcoming trial The New York times finds itself unable to mention that he has served as an unwilling laboratory for torture techniques. The article cites testimony obtained by torture but conveniently fails to mention how it was obtained. The New York Times characterizes KSM’s false information given during his torture as an example of KSM “ demonstrating his tendency toward grandiosity”. In all of this verbiage, the article  has  this and only this to say about his torture:
 
“Mr. Mohammed’s initial defiance toward his captors set off an interrogation plan that would turn him into the central figure in the roiling debate over the C.I.A’s interrogation methods. He was subjected 183 times to the near-drowning technique called waterboarding, treatment that Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. has called torture. But advocates of the C.I.A’s methods, including former Vice President Dick Cheney, have said that the interrogation methods produced a trove of information that helped dismantle Al Qaeda and disrupt potential terrorism attacks.”
 
 
For information about the torture of KSM, which is evidently unavailable to  The New York Times, you can read the Red Cross Report here:

 
Military Lawyer Claims U.S. Paid Gitmo Prosecution Witnesses PDF Print E-mail
Wednesday, 05 August 2009 13:53

Full Article here!

 
First steps taken to implement preventive detention, military commissions PDF Print E-mail
Wednesday, 22 July 2009 11:15

Article on Salon

 
the quality of mercy is (a little) strain'd redux PDF Print E-mail
Sunday, 19 July 2009 19:16

The Washington Post offers a “more nuanced look” at James E. Mitchell, “Master of the Mind (Expletive)”

 
Violating the Geneva Conventions is a war crime under US law PDF Print E-mail
Friday, 12 June 2009 13:57

From the War Crimes Act:

(a) Offense.— Whoever, whether inside or outside the United States, commits a war crime, in any of the circumstances described in subsection (b), shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for life or any term of years, or both, and if death results to the victim, shall also be subject to the penalty of death.

(b) Circumstances.— The circumstances referred to in subsection (a) are that the person committing such war crime or the victim of such war crime is a member of the Armed Forces of the United States or a national of the United States (as defined in section 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act).

(c) Definition.— As used in this section the term “war crime” means any conduct—

(1) defined as a grave breach in any of the international conventions signed at Geneva 12 August 1949, or any protocol to such convention to which the United States is a party;

(2) prohibited by Article 23, 25, 27, or 28 of the Annex to the Hague Convention IV, Respecting the Laws and Customs of War on Land, signed 18 October 1907;

(3) which constitutes a grave breach of common Article 3 (as defined in subsection (d)) when committed in the context of and in association with an armed conflict not of an international character

 

The PDF is here

 

 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next > End >>
Page 2 of 5